According to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 645 children have died from Covid-19 in the US.
In what new fuzzy arithmetic is 645 more than 619,591?
According to the latest CDC provisional data at the time of printing, 970 people aged 0-18 years died with COVID-19 in the 2+ years between 01/04/2020 - 02/12-2022.
Next, CARS. According to the IIHS, even more children aged 0-15 died in motor vehicle crashes in 2019: 1,224. If it’s embarrassing at 970, the upper limit must be at 1,200, when it goes from embarrassment to what, tragedy? About 20% more children died from car crashes in one year then from COVID-19 in two years, even with the larger demographic sampled (ages 16-18) in CDC data. The IIHS includes a 16-19 bracket, which shows America lost 1,995 people to car crash fatalities. That’s three times as many dead children in cars, in half the time as COVID. And it happens every year.
Let’s check the statistics again, collated for easy comparison.
ABORTIONS - 619,591
CAR FATALITIES - 1,995
COVID DEATHS - 645
Settled science, that is. Now, is there any reason the third leading cause of death in this random selection of causes is the focus such tyranny and profit? But the mother’s freedom would be infringed by a baby and her body invaded, and the cost…
Which lives matter enough to “screw your freedom”?
Can sexual promiscuity, unwanted children and unwed motherhood be declared national emergencies, locking down the country and force sterilizing people until the numbers say? The evidence is there.
Comparing mandatory masks or injections to wearing a seat belt in a car is not only a spurious and false equivalency, but it reveals a curiously self-confounding bit of evidence when the data is analyzed, even glanced at. Does Fauci think the vehicular transportation system in America (or other developed nations) is an embarrassment as well as having “even 100 children” die of an infectious disease, and if “even 100 children” die of injection related injuries, is that also an embarrassment? How many have died, do you know? You’ll find the numbers are not readily available and any mention of them is represented only in a flurry of factchecking articles marking them as false, misleading or lacking in context, when the factchecks themselves are mostly false, misleading and lacking context.
What is the purpose of a system like VAERS? Is it to make sure people do what they’re told, or to make sure the vaccines do what the People were told they do? Is it the goal of regulation to keep people safe from the effects of predatory profit-seeking corporations, or to protect those beneficent and heroic marvels of modern scientific industry from the braying masses of ignorant simple folk wielding their dangerous freedoms, minor logistical inconveniences and damaging opinions?
To quote this article in the Journal of the American Medical Association:
Based on passive surveillance reporting in the US, the risk of myocarditis after receiving mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines was increased across multiple age and sex strata and was highest after the second vaccination dose in adolescent males and young men. This risk should be considered in the context of the benefits of COVID-19 vaccination.
So the risk of vaccine injuries should be considered, in the context of the benefits of natural immunity. The data indicate that this particular risk is dose dependent (as any measurable effects would be), but what is not known is the long term risks (such as vaccine induced myocarditis children). There is no study on it, not a single one. So to say that the vaccines are safe is to make a claim without evidence. Testing was simply not done. Are mandates a substitute for clinical trials now?
One of the authors of the above mentioned study, an employee at the CDC named John R. Su, also put together this presentation on myocarditis in children, published December 16th, 2021.
Only two deaths are among the 3,233 reports VAERS received after 7,141,428 doses were administered to children 5-11.
It’s less than a thousandth of a percent. Tiny. But at scale, 0.000618% of 7,141,428 = 4,413. These statistics suggest 6.8 times more children may have died of the cure than the disease. Is someone from the CDC going to follow up with 7 million jabbed kids?
At the end, a seemingly standard bit of boilerplate legal disclaimer, along with the official CDC branding and a large image of a corona virus:
The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
What is this doing on the CDC site, with CDC branding and byline of a CDC employee, if it isn’t necessarily the official position of the CDC? In case something goes wrong, the organization can dissociate from the author, from the report, without consequences to the organization as a whole, since it’s just an employee’s opinion. Is it dangerous misinformation?
“And if your eye is causing you to sin, tear it out and throw it away from you. It is better for you to enter life with one eye, than to have two eyes and be thrown into the fiery hell.”
-Matthew 18:16
Perhaps the CDC is the Christian Doctrine Center, and the virus is sin, but we’re not in the middle ages are we? Still, a doctor can be wrong, can be banned from social media and license revoked, receive death threats and be defamed on every reputable news network, but not the CDC. The institution itself remains untarnished by the actions of some few mere employees, unlike the Catholic Church which is now almost exclusively associated with the actions of some small contingent of their employees and not the broad majority of works. (see also:US Department of Education, the “McDonald’s of Childhood Sexual Abuse”)
Who’s the peer review of the CDC? Who cancels the CDC when it’s been caught lying to the tune of treason? The WHO? The roughly identical World Health Organization, or the IMF, World Bank?
It has to be something. It can’t be nothing. Who can take seriously the following claim: there are zero conspiracies! Just repeating the same words and implementing the same far reaching policies, everyone sort of moving in one kind of direction, like schooling fish or starlings and it only seems coordinated from outside to idiot conspiracy theorists who eat their own boogers in their mom’s basement.
No you silly INCELS, no one is guiding the herd into neatly productive feed lots, because they’re all just interchangeable nodes within a networked super-organism of which their behavior is an emergent property. Simple as. It’s just interests aligning, if you must, but it IS happening. And here’s why it’s a good thing…
Safe, adj. - We are safe from consequences, you are not.
Effective, adj. - We didn’t actually test it, we suppressed competition and that worked.
Free, adj. - In unrelated news, the IRS put your money in my bank account. All that nice stuff we did for you was purely out of the goodness of our big compassionate hearts and we’d do it all over again, especially if profits wane like product efficacy.
Don’t people disagree often? For instance, there is a great deal of diversity of medical opinion in the world. Does science work by bureaucratic cable, legal injunction and public relations? I thought it was through observation, hypothesis and experimentation in open inquiry, repeatedly. Is data science the aggregation of data to build functional understanding of complex systems, or the manipulative misrepresentation of data to manufacture consensus instrumental to profit and ideological motives?
Everything the organization puts out could be false, but you’d never know because they’re also the self-appointed authority on the matter. We’ve investigated ourselves and found us not guilty. In fact we deserve a raise. If the organization puts its logo on a thing that turns out badly, it will cover it up, quietly change it on their website, countersue, pay a settlement (see also: hush money) or a proximal cause employee or an entire Scapegoat Department or perhaps a CEO will be shuffled into another C Suite, but the whole will be preserved as it desires to maintain its continuity like anybody, any BODY, a CORPOration (corp is a latin root for body) wants to make money. Because it benefits those in possession of the body. It’s only natural that the head rules.
The question as to who or what is in possession of the body is beyond the scope of this article, but highly relevant.
Thanks for reading Oddly Enough News! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.
